http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=55545. 15 min burn test (FX, Dynbkg)on a Geforce GTX 650 Ti, What about the GTX 560? Scores on this page must be bad…. FurMark Preset: 1080(FHD) Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1070 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by AJDaMan at 22:09 Aug … I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C, Number of GPUs: 1 drivers: 9.18.13.2018 (5-12-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 oc. CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn. CPU: 3013 MHz 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GTX 1070 Ti Furmark Test w/ Custom Fan Curve. The top model of the GL504 with a Core i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070, 32 GB of RAM, and a 512-GB SSD is able to achieve first (Home Score) or second place (Work Score… Dynamic background Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], BURN-IN SCORE: 4642 points 8GB DDR3 1800 + SSD, Burn in 15min 1080p BURN-IN SCORE: 4638 points Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 Catalyst: 13.5 Resolution: 1280 x 720 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz, Is that about right?? – Radeon RX 5500 XT – GeForce GTX TITAN I ran the Test with my Asus GTX 560 Ti 1GB DDR5( Burn in benchmark 1920x 1080) and got a Score of 2559 points. Update: 2016.08.25 I'd save the money and just overclock your processor. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Does that sound alright? GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section. CPU: Intel (R ) Core (TM) i7-3770K 4x CPU@3.50GHz / 8x cpu virtuell mit cpu boost 3,9 ghz pro kern GPU0 – Vendor: 0x1002 – Device: 0x6798 – Max GPU temp: 71 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz If you have overclocked, scale it back a little. Preset:1080 Intel Core i7-9700K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} Power Limit—- 0-5% start at 0 then go to 5 one at a time running benchmark after every increase 2046 MB SCORE: 3778 points (62 FPS), Submitted by kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:11 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1004 Hope that fits the bill until I can get a bigger better card for this new 27-inch Asus steroescopic 3D monitor. I cant test under 1080. Each entry includes the model of the graphics card with clock speeds, the TPC (Total Power Consumption) of the X58 testbed at idle and under full load, the max GPU temperature and the graphics driver version. Might help. – added Preset:2160 scores. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:8 samples GPU core: 1380MHz – GeForce RTX 2070, Update: 2017.12.13 – GeForce GTX TITAN Black Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1180 AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Update: 2017.12.12 first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. y have a 560ti, it s not here and y have note that when y run the program the gpu works at 475mhz :S. @hurt: I don’t have all available cards on the market (fortunately, otherwise the benchmarking session will never end… ). GTX 1070 im Test: 6K- und 8K-Benchmarks mittels DSR . CPU-Geschwindigkeit: 3510MHz How come 5+3/2=2 eh? Furmark – 1920×1080 GPU clock: 1050 MHz Its not adding up. festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb Who’s laughing now. 3125 MHz My goodness, how in the world did I completely miss this post? and i forgot to mention this but the resolution was 1024*768 at 720p. Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples I'm not really sure why i can only grab 11fps tho. The same card scores 10328 points in Time Spy Extreme preset. But can in 720. Score 264. temps seem to be really good and runs WoW very smooth. 3500 MHz 16289 MB Though later would have unfairly greater burn-in stress-level compared to former one, exclusively in case of Intel HD IGP’s. profile 5 is my comfort level and pretty sure its pretty high setting (see below) as im a noob at using this kind of software. GPU mem: 1800MHz GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1180 – Max GPU temp: 77 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz I get a failure when I try to Submit results. FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) I have a Phantom 410 with 1 stock intake and 1 Premium intake both 120mm, 1 120mm stock exhaust at the rear and a 140mm prem and 120mm prem exhaust at the top through a corsair H100 Radiator. ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. Core Voltage—- 1031(mV) OpenGL renderer Benchmark_name Resolution Score Submited by Date; Radeon RX 570 … Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples resolution:1920×1080 But I feel like this is quite low compared to my old 6850. GPU core: 950MHz Catalyst 12.8 – 8.982-120727a-145524C-ATI (7-27-2012), Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz, Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493 , 3940 score on 1080p with my single 6970 2gb is this seems really good. Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples MSAA samples: 0 Settings: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. 4gb DDR3 ram. ya better then a 580 , Burn-INSCORE: 2618 points i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. Is that bad if so what could be causing this? GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) SLI Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! Windows 8 64-bit build 9200. wont submit scores. Saphire 7870 got me a 3354 on the Burn in benchmark. 9.18.13.2049 (6-21-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000. It strives for the excellence in power, speed, cooling, noise, gaming, and size with no compromise on performance. GPU clock: 1050 MHz GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 OS:Windows 7 64-bit, 2690 frames, 44 FPS, 81°C Its pretty strange. I got an intel core i5 4460 3,2GHz, asrock h97 anniversary mobo, 240gb samsung evo 850 ssd (Win10 inside), gtx 1070 palit 8GB, hyperx ddr3 8 gb RAM, 1TB HDD. Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Frames 2250 Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. My pair of overclocked 460’s gets just over 5000 points with the 720p test. Operating system: Windows 8 64-bit build 9200 No Service Pack. Or Firestrike? Max temp 92°C, I beat the top score for the 6970 i got 4784 points (79 FPS), http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=107774, nvidia geforce gt520 But this is my first pascal card. http://www.techpowerup.com/164027/1366-x-768-The-Most-Popular-Screen-Resolution-Overtakes-1024-x-768-StatCounter.html. CPU speed:4709 MHz Shapphire Radeon HD 6850 temperature 57°C. GPU core: 1050 MHz, memory: 1425 MHz I should also mention, 46093 frames, 51 FPS, 76°C Windows 7 64-bit build 760 Memory clock: 3004 MHz System Memory: 16330 MB What are your thoughts? My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good! can anyone comment on this regarding the above observed data. Resolution: 1024×768 (W) – AA:0 samples 9.18.13.1422 (3-14-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 Welcome to the Geekbench OpenCL Benchmark Chart. Renderer: Geforce GTX 670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) 4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. But then again, I'm not one of the smart folks who know all about troubleshooting. AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) FPS: min:51, max:53, avg:51, Still cant play skyrim in surround with enb.. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. thanks in advance! FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL. Windows XP 32 Bit Core Clock—- 950(MHz) This isn't much hotter than my 970, is this about what I should expect for a Reference Pascal card? ... 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score… http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=110734, GeForce GTX 660/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C0) I am registered. Window режим: полноэкранный Temperature was 78°. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples See this article for details on powertune. This means that the […] Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz It’s obviously not a correct score, and every other benchmark it gets its expected score in. 1080p and over 2500 points with HD 7870… Max. We have the first benchmarks results for the upcoming flagship TITAN-class graphics card, the GeForce RTX 3090. 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 FPS: min:45, max:46, avg:44 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, GeForce GTX 760/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1187) Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing! Treiber: 9.18.13.2680 (2013.08.18)-GL: nvoglv64 The reference clock speeds of the GPU are: 1290MHz for the base clock and 1392MHz for the boost clock. FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL / Vulkan. Renderer: Geforce x2 sli GTX670/PCIe/SSEE2 (10DE-1189) GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 72°C, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100494 Fan Speed at 50% of test 74-76% Preset:1080 i got a 413 score for ati mobility radeon 550v. so whats’ wrong? GPU core: 1280 MHz, memory: 3121 MHz 8gb mem installed (factory), will expand to the 32 at a later date Burn-in Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 [No Service Pack], Sapphire Radeon 7870xt 2gb ddr5 – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti GPU core: 1165 MHz, memory: 1375 MHz I only got 1488 points (24 FPS, 60000 ms). Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 FPS: min:50, max:65, avg:51 – OPTIONS: DynBkg I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can. @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. Memory clock: 3004 MHz 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. score: 610 points, temp: 65 celcius. ASUS P8Z77-VLK Bench duration: 15min GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Hope this helps in some way. The score of your HD 5970 looks correct, because (Running the Benchmark itself, so fullscreen, not windowed. Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points Renderer AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series (1002-6739) Why is there no 6850 listed? These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). SCORE: 5627 points (93 FPS), Submitted by Kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:14 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds Sounds quite low to me . 1080 preset: 1306 points (21 FPS, 60000 ms), Phenom II X3 720 2.8 ghz. But this is my first pascal card. Is it about what I should be expecting though? fan speed I have on 100% but thats personal preference on what you do for that. Duration: 5min Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7600 No Service Pack, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=152562, 3534 points with a stock oc (735/1010) 5970 @1920×1080. GPU mem: 1300MHz Preset:1080 Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:4 samples (The MB Fans are the two fans synced to temperature.). Renderer:GeForce GTX 480 Benchmark Preset Score GPU When; FurMark(donut) | OpenGL: P1080: 4254: Radeon RX 570 Series clocks: GPU core: 1084 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). Resolution: 1920 x 1080 I meant (and 1x 4:3, leaving out 16:10) instead of (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) in above (second last) post. The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) zotac geforce gtx 1070 ti amp extreme edition 8gb gddr5 zt-p10710b-10p Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:2827 points (47 FPS, 60000 ms) und 2x westerndigital 500gb und 32mb cache …. 2 different tests on 15 min burn. Please clarify: you state the benches are 1080 preset but also burn-in test mode – those are two separate button in 1.10.0 unless it’s the 15-min burn-in? GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz Drivers Catalyst 12.3 -8.961-120405a-137813C-ATI (4-5-2012) System Info: These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). Jerome, somethings wrong here. Overclock it, the card will protect itself against heat, And don't use furmark, that's terrible for the GPU. 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* Максимальная температура 66 ° C I haven't cranked up the memory clock very far as i'm new to OC'ing, using MSI Afterburner. I let the test run for an hour. Минимальная температура 38 ° C MSAA samples: 0 I also have two monitors (if that makes any difference). http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006 OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this: CPU: 4616 MHz FPS: min:80, max:81, avg:80 – OPTIONS: DynBkg 72 degrees C Testing furmark … 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) CPU Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz Window mode: fullscreen system memory:16324 MB 6GB(3×2)DDR3 Tri-Chan Corsair Vengeance 2000Mhz Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, Cross 7970 1000/1450 CPU speed: 3403 MHz Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2700K CPU @ 3.50GHz Preset:1080 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor 1080p Catalyst 13.9 – 13.152-130830a-162200C-ATI (8-30-2013) Fan Speed at 100% of test 76-77% Max GPU Temp: 80°C galaxy geforce gt610 2gb, Temp at 50% 64c Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° PC Specification: This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. Isnt that a little low for my rig? ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) max temp: 79C GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ Graphics score looks fine. So what’s the formula here my man. 1280*1024 score was 976 with 16fps is it alright? Here are the final benchmark results of this new card, compared to GTX 1080 Ti (factory-OC), 1080 (factory-OC) and 1070 (stock clocks). MSI GTX 1050 Ti is powered by a full Pascal GP107 GPU. Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 Service Pack 1. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit скамьи Продолжительность: 15 мин Who’s laughing now. I am on an old version of Furmark if that makes any difference (v1.19.0.0). 46102 frames, 51 FPS, 87°C My non-overclocked GTX-1070 achieves a FurMark score of 5953, with 99 FPS average. I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. 1090t 6 core processor 8 gigs ram. Overall score is a bit low due to your CPU. Oh and i modified my fan settings to run at 80% at 50 Cel and 100% at 70 cel, i had a steady temp of 60 at peak. Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010) I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1004 – Max GPU temp: 65 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz I had sli 1070's and I was getting the odd stutter and crash and I didn't know what was causing it until I swapped cards one day when I was having game crashes and instantly got checkerboarding on the screen and any 3d application worked badly. Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples Windows XP 32-bit build 2600 [Dodatek Service Pack 3], SCORE:4800 points (80 FPS, 60000 ms) Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS) Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz The GP107 is the first GPU built with the 14nm process (Samsung) and packs 768 CUDA cores, 32 ROPs and 48 textures units. GPU core: 952 MHz, memory: 2257 MHz Burn-In score 2585points(28 FPS) How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings? A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. Clcok:GPU core: 700 MHz, memory: 1848 MHz FPS: min:86, max:87, avg:85 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Fan: 75%. Zum Abschluss der Leistungsbetrachtung haben wir ein paar unserer berühmt-berüchtigten Extrem-Benchmarks für Sie. Running the 1920×1080 on my HD 6670 gave me a whopping 531 pts (4891 frames, 5FPS, 62°C). To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) CPU Speed 2395 MHz 3D tech news, graphics cards, graphics programming and demoscene, Update: 2020.01.24 GPU core: 775 MHz, memory: 1000 MHz You won't see that much of an improvement with a 6700k. using msi afterburner. System Memory |2046MB RAM: 16383 MB That's running the 1080 Preset, with NVidia driver now back in Quality mode. Average 38fps. 1830 MHz/1535 MB CM HAFx FULL TOWER WINDOW RAM: DDR3 GSKILL Ripjaw 16383 MB Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC I have a gt8500 and i scored {SCORE:95 points (1 FPS, 60000 ms)} is that correct? MSAA samples: 0 Average 36fps. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. The GTX 1070-based laptops will score anywhere between 87 and 97 FPS, which will require a fair bit of tweaking to match a 120Hz monitor. – GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760. Built on the 16 nm process, and based on the GP104 graphics processor, in its GP104-200-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. should mention OS win8 64 bit GPU temperatures (start/end): 39°C / 77°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Max GPU Temp: 90°C 7850 In this review we test the GeForce GTX 1070 (Nvidia Founders Edition). This seems surprisingly low to me. Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C 63Deg C. Overclock it? Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 22704 frames, 25 FPS, 70’C Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 System memory: 4094 MB I'd be interested in others thoughts (other than "you should have bought a 1080).
The most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 @ 1920×1080 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Can’t wait to get another one of these suckers and crossfire them but until then, Witcher 2 is pretty pleased with this overclock totally maxed even ubersampling, I tried to benchmark 9800GTX at 720p with no AA and GPU crashed after like 15 seconds. GPU clock: 1019 MHz Update drivers etc too. Three kind of scores are available on these charts: Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode). Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points BTW, am using v1.10.0. Catalyst – 8.723.8.2-100920a-105610C-Sony (9-20-2010) 13190 frames, 14 FPS FPS: min:29, max:32, avg:30 – OPTIONS: DynBkg Intel Core i7 2700K OEM UNLOCK But you should see a good difference MSAA: 0x. saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. I got 3515 points with my HD5970… Higher than the HD7970! Getting a new 8350 machine with a gtx 780 next week and I will run same exact test. Or passmark’s performance test 9? GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3445 MHz You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. Please answer to mail: aleks2990@hotmail.com, BURN-INSCORE:2145 points (35 FPS, 60000 ms) Furmark screenshot at the end of 1 hour 12 minutes along with the custom fan curve are posted in this imgur album.
Asus Laptop Tastatur Wechseln,
Ratenzahlung Tiho Hannover,
Kita-gebühren Nrw August 2020,
öz Urfa Bremen,
English Letter Formal,
Wiesenmühle Fulda Speisekarte 2019,
Frühstück In Paris Chords,