We will be publishing more articles as these new processors launch, so be sure to keep a close eye on our list of Hardware Articles in the coming weeks. Yep, it looks like performance has gotten worse for the active tasks we are testing since we first made the reference scores. (assuming that the 10700k in these results is on par with that old 9900k). Puget Systems Lightroom Classic Benchmark. Why? With that being said, this is going to be a new build for me, and I plan on using it for gaming + my wife will be using it for photo editing (lightroom and some basic photoshop.) In Photoshop is “opening a file” or “filter results” for me very important, and on and on... Lightroom is sooo good and simultaneously sooo bad :-) I love and edit my files sometimes in Capture One too, but I found Lightroom for my organisational tasks a little bit better. Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X, Lightroom Classic CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series. I’ve narrowed it down to 2 top contenders, the TR 3960X and the Zen 5900X. How about a comparison between the fastest affordable Quadro (the RTX4000) and the GTX 2080 TI? A faster export is certainly welcome. Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen. Is the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X good for Lightroom Classic? Yep, you are right on the average thing, the only thing you missed was that we multiple the average by 10 because a bigger number means it is more important. It also gets a bit hairy for us since we are partners with many of these companies, and very few of them seem to welcome head-to-head comparisons. No, SMT (and HT on Intel) is on. Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. The API is about as barebones as it could possibly be which makes it really difficult to get a benchmark created that isn't going to constantly break. We are working on getting the benchmark up for download. AMD has had a strong lead in Lightroom Classic for passive tasks like exporting, but Intel managed to maintain a small advantage for active tasks like scrolling through images and switching between modules. Our Lightroom Classic benchmark tests a wide range of tasks that are divided between "active" tasks (scrolling through images, brush lag, etc.) Putting a dual slot video card right next to the HP Z Turbo Drive would likely create heat issues as Hard Disk Sentinel says it's the hottest running drive in my machine. Could you make the benchmark downloadble to execute yourself? 8.4)Overall Score: 1000Active Tasks Score: 100Passive Tasks Score: 100, I dont understand why if everything is normalized to 9900K, why the score for 9900K is not 1000 (100 active / 100 passive), Yeah, compare is really interesting.. Thanks for the info on Lightroom's inability to use SMT. On my system, for the Develop sliders (the only performance characteristic I care about as I spend 90+% of my Lightroom time dragging sliders), V9.1 was a slowdown and 9.2 a huge slowdown. It's more expensive, but you get more cores, threads, and headroom in games and software. At least today we have the option to get twice the performance for twice the money. Things have actually changed a bit regarding HT/SMT with Lightroom Classic V9.0 . Archived. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also wanted to provide the individual results. So, it is possible the work they are doing there is negatively affecting the tasks we can test, but LrC is still way better overall for the end users. As always you guys do great work, thank you for the excellent write-ups and tests! Lightroom Classic is not an easy application to directly benchmark, but we hope to have a publicly available version for download in the coming months. That reference score is completely static and won't ever change until we add tests to our benchmark that forces us to re-create it. Listed below are the specifications of the systems we will be using for our testing: *All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of November 11th, 2019. Until recently, even 3200MHz didn't meet our stability standards, and going above that is definitely going to cause more system instability. You already know it better!• Looking at the NEF numbers, there is really no reason to spend even a penny more for a 3950x instead of a 3900x (for Photoshop and Lightroom only). One of the reasons we sometimes used the Intel 10th Gen CPUs over Ryzen when the performance was similar was because only Intel platforms had passed our qualification process for Thunderbolt. Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance Hier haste einen Vergleich. Even if some processes are slower, exporting and building previews can be twice as fast. Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Lightroom Classic. The devs have also been putting a ton of work into improving many aspects of LrC that we haven't figured out a good way to test like brush/slider lag and things like that. The i7 7700K is $50 cheaper than the AMD 1700X, and yet it outclasses the 1700X in both lightroom and photoshop (and web browing performance, etc): Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. Ryzen 3000 series Lightroom performance? Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. Feel free to skip to the next section for our analysis of these results if you rather get a wider view of how each CPU performs in Lightroom Classic. Since that reference score was made, we've upgraded to Lightroom Classic 9.0 and there have been numerous BIOS, driver, and Windows updates that have come though. I have BIG catalogs- 30K to 100K images. Even this relatively small 10% increase in performance allows the modest Ryzen 5 5600X to beat every single Intel processor we tested, although it only snuck by the Intel Core i9 10900K by a few percent. That is the same reason we use a NVMe storage drive as well. Maybe in the future we will try to figure out reliable ways to check for all those things, but for now we are more concerned about making the benchmarks reliable and that they are testing everything we want. First things first: Thank you for the lightning fast testing of the new 3950X!However, it is very difficult to draw meaningful conclusions without a closer look at your numbers:• You seem to have tested Intel with HT-on. You can apply those after you're done, as a batch. With that really quick look at workstation performance out-of-the-way, we can move onto a look at gaming performance – aka: the true reason for this article’s existence today. From what I remember, the difference between various CPUs for 1:1 previews was pretty close to what we see with generating smart previews. Calibrating the monitors had no impact as expected, Datacolor Spyder 5 Pro. Generally though, most people don't upgrade their CPU every generation since the performance gains usually aren't enough to warrant it. One of the first things is to get our Lightroom Classic benchmark up for public download. As for the future, only the developers could tell you.4) No way to really know. I really wouldn't advise going above 3200MHz though. I found these past couple of benchmarks incredibly helpful in choosing my next CPU. But 9960x is suddenly much worse with smart previews in comparison to your October-Benchmark. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles to keep up to date on how all of these software packages - and more - perform with the latest CPUs. The Ryzen 7 3700X is the next step up from the Ryzen 5 3600X in terms of performance and price. Lightroom is hard to benchmark since the things that are easiest to test (importing, exporting, generating previews, etc.) Is this right? so great that you did the test with the new 9.0 version! Some of the active tasks are accelerated by LR through the GPU ... Perhaps the difference in CPU performance would be much clearer with a lower GPU.• Many Lightroom users still have a Core i7-4700K in use. Quite often I have to let my computer sit there over night while it churns out previews… I don’t want to do that. I will quote from your Lightroom benchmark procedure : How does the scoring work?The scoring system used in our benchmark is based on the performance relative to a reference system with the following specifications: Intel Core i9 9900K 8 CoreNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB64GB of RAMSamsung 960 Pro 1TBWindows 10 (1903)Adobe Lighroom Classic CC 2019 (ver. And 4) Lastly, AMD is saying that the TR socket will be compatible with future Treadrippers… If the 2 CPU’s are close already, does that push the TR over the top to make it that worth the added expense? What is also interesting is Affinity Photo as a serious alternativ in some workflows (not all) for Photoshop. For years, neither Intel nor AMD have done anything to really justify an upgrade. If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the total scores. Maybe you should setup a databases system where people could upload their results to compare with others. Even if we do out own testing on older platforms, nothing is ever going to be as accurate as comparing the performance of the exact system you are using today to whatever the latest hardware is. It’s the Mac Pro that’s *REALLY* bad. Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. it is very hard to know where you stand with performance on your current system. Should you choose the new Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core CPU or the Intel i9 9900K 8-core? In the worst constellation and best constellation, I bet there exist more than 40% difference (LR Classic and PS). Multi displays can make it really hard to tell what the actual screen resolution is if there are different display resolutions in use, as does different DPI settings. Interesting, that is a much larger difference than we have seen. It probably isn't just Lightroom though, Windows updates and drivers also have an impact on performance - and sometimes not in a good way. With this motherboard, Thunderbolt support is no longer as much of a factor when choosing between Intel 10th Gen and AMD Ryzen CPUs in our workstations. Is anyone out there using Lightroom with i9 or Ryzen CPUs? Can you please explain this? CL timings are really hard (impossible from what I have found so far) to get directly at the level we have access to through the various Adobe APIs. How is the performance? Big THX again for your invested time, very kind of you. I notice that you perform the Lightroom benchmarks with 3200Mhz CL22 memory. One thing we do want to note is that the pre-launch BIOS that is available for Ryzen motherboards is using AGESA 1.0.8. Since the 5600x isn't out yet, there's no testing to indicate if it's supposed faster single core speed will help improve performance in Lightroom over a CPU like the 3700x, which is around the same price but has 2 more cores/4 more threads. Screen resolution is easier, but it also more complicated than it sounds. It will probably end up being a pretty big project since we are going to have to take into account how many displays are being used as well as the resolution for each display (since that apparently is a big factor for Lightroom GPU performance). In fact, this is the speed we are planning on using in our Ryzen workstations once JDEC DDR4-2933 16GB sticks are available. What took the Ryzen 3 3100 1,026 seconds to encode dropped to 200 seconds once a GPU was added in. To get up to the same performance as a RTX 2080 Ti, you are going to need a Quadro RTX 6000, and even then it will likely be slightly slower. However, the increase in core count comes with a fairly large MSRP price of $749. And that '100' benchmark was established with a 9900k system. The reason we use a 2080Ti in our CPU-based testing is simply to make sure that the GPU is not a bottleneck. Also, waiting for the LR benchmark. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. HP Z440, 6-core Xeon, 64GB ECC RAM, Quadro K1200 4GB, five SSDs (dedicated Samsung 2TB 860 EVO on the PCIe bus for the library/catalog and 1 TB Samsung 840 EVO for the Preview Cache), two 4K monitors but Lightroom full screen on just one monitor. Overall, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is currently the fastest CPU we have tested for Lightroom Classic, but the extra 5% performance over the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X for a 50% increase in cost is likely to be hard to justify for most users. For me in my example, switching between Modules in Lightroom and scrolling in developer modul is very important, also 1:1 Rendering . PugetBench V0.8 BETA for Lightroom Classic, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. If you take results seriously, you must search for your workflow results in details. If your workflow includes other software packages (we have similar articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, and Photoshop), you need to consider how the system will perform in those applications as well. System Specs ----- Asus Pro X370 Prime (Bios 0515) Ryzen 1700x @ … Granted, I’m importing thousands of RAW files at a time and exporting hundreds of JPG’s (the life of a family photographer on the beach). It shouldn't affect performance much, but good benchmarking is about removing variables to try to get the most accurate results as possible. I honestly don't know what specifically has caused that drop, but there have been a number of Intel security vulnerabilities that have been fixed at the expense of performance, and Lightroom Classic is adding more GPU acceleration which sometimes can reduce performance at first until they get it really dialed in.
Trossingen Hochschule Bib,
Wetter Orf Kärnten Villach,
Zoo Hannover Jahreskarte,
Jeder Ist Beziehungsfähig Kritik,
Bergsee Sinzheim Vormberg,
Aumeister Kommende Veranstaltungen,
Adobe Photoshop Kaufen Schweiz,
Adm Hamburg Gehalt,