No geral, isto torna a 3ª Geração AMD Ryzen a atual recomendação da Puget Systems para o Lightroom Classic. 4 slots populated with 16GB modules each gives a maximum of 64GB. I wonder why these folks who are "complaining that we are making them under-perform" don't also say they have run into stabity problems like Puget has discovered. All I need is 10-bit support to run my 10-bit monitors. Lightroom CC 2015.10.1 CPU Comparison: Skylake-X, Kaby Lake-X, Broadwell-E, Kaby Lake, Ryzen 7, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Performance, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance. Disabling HT is one fix, but you can also just adjust the processor affinity so that Lr doesn't use the virtual cores and it gets back most of that performance without affecting other applications. Recommended Systems For: Adobe Lightroom Classic; Adobe Photoshop; Post Production. A few percent here or there but it was inconsistent whether on or off was better. If I had to give a guess, probably late November. You may want to skip over the 3800X since the 3700X performs almost exactly the same, but all the other models are great choices. Worst case, it shouldn't be more than a week or two after launch that we have at least most of our articles up. However, since the 1700X and 1800X have eight CPU cores, we also included in our testing a number of "High End" Core i7 CPUs from Intel with six to ten CPU cores. As far as the Intel X-series and AMD Threadripper processors go, there honestly isn't much to talk about. Since the installation of the Fall Creators Update, Microsoft has been pushing AMDx64-specific updates which seem to be improving stability & performance as well. I recommend waiting for 3950x. The reason behind this is simply that previously, we did not have Ryzen fully qualified as an entire platform and were not comfortable running the RAM beyond the official specifications. Not saying you can't do it of course, but just be aware of the potential issues before jumping into it. Basically, we saw a total export time of 162 seconds with the 3570K, 107.6 with the 7700K and 68.8 with the 6850K. I'm totally aware this is not something scientific but nevertheless super valuable. A few quick questions if you have a minute: - You mention in the article that something like a 9900K could feel snappier than a 3900x, but the scrolling, module switch, and auto-develop benchmarks are within like 2-3% at most. Getting micro-stutters if I absolutely try to shift to doing anything else up the the point where it's possible to freeze the machine. Since the 5600x isn't out yet, there's no testing to indicate if it's supposed faster single core speed will help improve performance in Lightroom … And yes I understand that you sell these systems to your customers at stock speeds. (3.4-4GHz Turbo) 10 Core. these observations, so this kind of knowledge is priceless. We have updated results looking at a range of CPUs in Lightroom including the Ryzen CPUs using the latest BIOS, drivers, and version of Lightroom: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . It's be interesting to see what the results would be if you were to script up parallel instances of Adobe's DNG converter to do the same 100 conversions. I definitely OC my rigs. Very good and detailed as usual. All of the CPUs besides ryzen and 7700k are using 32gb of ram. Intel Core i7 6950X 3.0GHz Thank you for nice comparison! And in some cases - primarily exporting and building smart previews - the Ryzen CPUs get … At the same time, if you do care about export times then the Intel Core i7 6850K is ~40% faster at exporting images along with being ~15% at everything else in Lightroom. However, if you are concerned primarily about export times, the i7 6850K is about 40% faster at exporting images in addition to being 11-16% faster for everything else - all for only a small increase in price. High performance mode is actually what we default to during benchmarks, but the difference between it and balanced shouldn't be much as long as the system isn't idle for too long. It is definitely an interesting question that I would love to know the answer to, though. Thunderbolt is finicky enough that we only ever use Gigabyte motherboards for it since they seem to be the best in terms of firmware/driver support. It could be dual vs quad channel RAM (although if that was it I would expect even worse performance from the i7 7700K) or it could be Intel-specific software optimization (but then I would expect better 7700K performance). If you want to compare the scores between each CPU with HT/SMT enabled when supported, the second image below includes those results. While most of our PC test platforms are using DDR4-2666 memory, we did decide to upgrade to DDR4-3200 for the AMD Ryzen platform which is different from our past testing where we used DDR4-3000 for Ryzen. The 3rd generation Ryzen processors are terrific for Lightroom Classic and were on average about 20% faster than a similarly priced Intel 9th gen processor. are limited to 1 thread in critical functions. I'm aware that 1700x might have been affected by the scheduler issues, but my bios, windows updates, drivers, etc are all up to date (which supposedly was to remove the issue). This new AMD CPUs are really nice :) Last year i have buyed (for next few years) an i7 9700K and its blazingly fast even with huge 42Mpx A7R3 files!I keep watching your reviews and if someone asks for photo/video computer, i know, where to go for relevant informations... :). Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. If you're bored, it'd be interesting to see if that translates to Lightroom. Especially the export benchmarks? I edit 2-4k pics monthly too, culling through at least 20k - on a mobile i5-4278U (2.6ghz). The 3rd generation Ryzen processors are terrific for Lightroom Classic and were on average about 20% faster than a similarly priced Intel 9th gen processor. It may be a year or two before Ryzen II addresses all of its limitations, until then, we have the 32 core Naples to look forward too. I'll be at Adobe MAX in a few weeks as well, which could potentially throw a wrench in things if the launch happens to be right around the same time. Programs like Photoshop and Lightroom deliver the best performance when they’re paired with generalist processors, like the Ryzen … Thunderbolt on PC is inconsistent enough even on fully certified platforms that I would highly recommend against using Thunerbolt on X570. We try to compensate by running the benchmark multiple times and taking the best overall run, but you still get those kinds of discrepancies. Tests results for DaVinci Resolve indicate, according to Puget Systems, that “the AMD Ryzen … We see similar margins when running the Puget Systems Lightroom Classic benchmark. If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the total scores. I dont have a ton of cash left for this and as I've been reading PS/LR don't rely much on the GPU. This limits the Ryzen platform to 64GB of RAM while the other platforms had 128GB, but since our Lightroom Classic benchmark never needs more than 32GB of RAM to run, this does not affect performance at all. ... 2019 iMac Pro vs 2019 Custom PC by Puget Systems: Lightroom … When AMD released the first of their 3rd generation Ryzen processors back in July 2019, they were quickly established as the fastest processors for Adobe Lightroom Classic. We discovered an issue with Intel Hyperthreading and AMD SMT that causes low performance for some tasks. However, if you really dig into the results, there are really two primary tasks where Ryzen blows away Intel that is causing the higher overall scores: exporting and building smart previews. Now, however, we have and are currently planning on offering DDR4-3200 for our customers once JEDEC 3200MHz RAM is readily available so we will be doing our testing with that speed of RAM. Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. Puget Systems Benchmarks on AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT. Meanwhile the R3 … Some of their apps (Acrobat anyone?) Intel Core i7 6900K 3.2GHz They probably won't, that's true, they are too lazy. Ryzen has seen about a 7% increase in performance since this article was published, but it looks like this is from general optimizations than anything AMD specific since Intel also saw performance gains. I did feel more lag when doing stuff on the internet, compared to what I am used to on systems with no active CPU load, but YouTube videos even at HD were perfectly smooth and the delays waiting for pages to load were not obnoxious. No problem at all! Unless the editing is really a pain for you. At the same time, the AMD Threadripper CPUs are just overall not a great fit for Lightroom, especially the higher-end "WX" models, so we would recommend avoiding them if possible. Full details on the benchmark are available at: While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also wanted to provide the individual results. It’s no surprise then that Puget Systems is considering moving a significant number of their rigs to the AMD Ryzen 5000 series. PUGET technical folks really know their stuff :). Starting with "everything else", Ryzen compares decently against the eight and ten core CPUs coming in at just 5-10% slower. Taken on a Canon EOS REBEL T3i, 5x 18MP RAW (5184x3456) It is one of the more "finicky" benchmarks we have since we have to use a lot of external scripts to do things that can't be done through the plug-in API. You are right that the 7700k should feel overall snappier and is better for photo editing work in general. It is kind of like how much storage you have available on an SSD - if you don't have enough that is a problem, but if you have a ton of empty space it doesn't make things go faster. Thanks for the reply. Maybe one of AMD's engineers could figure out what makes the difference, but in the end what really matters is actual real-world performance. I'll be sharing this among the community. If you can wait - just wait for 10th gen Intel. which makes it a pretty big project to tackle.2) Honestly, I think most of that is margin of error. The benchmarks we will be using are the latest version of our (as yet unreleased) Lightroom Classic benchmark. The other interesting result is generating 1:1 previews. I was wondering will you guys be doing a follow up test with the new Lightroom Classic? You guys are the only ones that do these kind of test in the business and are uniquely placed to do them fairly easy (I hope). It would not be terribly scientific, but if it would help inform your decision I'm up for giving it a shot :). Intel CPU will cost you around the same that this 3600 AMD CPU + motherboard.//Possibly you're gonna gain some performance when they resolve problems with HT (or not, I would not take this much into consideration). But I also feels like the time I spend working in LR makes it gradually more sluggish, even when I still have many GB's of RAM free - so if that's actually the case, then testing that might be even more complicated. I also don't think the result will be much different.