To give credit where credit is due, the Radeon R9 290 is also extremely impressive in 2019. It’s a competitive set of results for a title that’s among the toughest benchmarks around thanks to its reliance on high-end lighting and particle effects. My testing looked at an EVGA-overclocked GTX 970 and a reference RX 480. AMD’s mid-range RX 590 is the latest refresh of their Polaris-based RX 580, which in turn was a refresh of the RX 480. Is it worth shelling out for the new Radeon, or can Nvidia’s classic GTX 970 hold its own? In other words, this is one of the best GTX 970s around versus an early RX 480 that’ll surely improve over time with third-party manufacturers pre-overclocking it and adding beefy cooling systems. The GTX 970 is similarly quick at those resolutions and is a tad cheaper, but it doesn’t have the new architecture, the extra memory or the software improvements – as you’d expect for an older card, of course. The RX 480 maintained a good lead at 4K, too. AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop) remove from comparison. That’s good, but don’t expect either of these GPUs to handle 4K gaming. AMD also does well in The Division 2, Sniper Elite 4, Forza Horizon 4, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. This card competes against Nvidia's GTX 1050 Ti and replaces the older Radeon RX 470. The AMD Radeon RX 590 is a desktop graphics card positioned in the mid-range of 2018. This means that the narrow lead the GTX 970 shows in any of the above benchmarks will likely be diminished by more powerful RX 480s. Again, the GTX 970 was 12% slower than the R9 290, though despite that performance was still very playable. The Radeon RX 570 is the second in the line-up of AMD’s 500 series of GPUs targeting the popular mid-range market. The RX 590 has a 115 MHz higher core clock speed and 104 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 1050.This results in the RX 590 providing … This can be seen when comparing the GTX 1060 and RX 580 for example, it can also be seen when comparing older GPUs such as the GTX 970 and R9 290. The Radeon averaged 27.33fps at 4K. Moving on we decided to see how the GTX 970 stacks up against the GTX 1060 6GB. There’s a lot to like about the fourth iteration of the Graphics Core Next system, not least the move from a 28nm to a 14nm manufacturing process. TECHSPOT : Tech Enthusiasts, Power Users, Gamers. That placed both the GTX 970 and R9 290 on par with the 3GB 1060. The Radeon RX Vega 56 is the weakest member of AMD's Vega GPU family. I recall this being a very easy win for the R9 290 back in the day, but here it was just 5% on average. If they drop in price even further, they’re still an excellent buy. The new architecture employs 8GB of second generation high-bandwidth memory (HBM2). Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019) Radeon RX 5700 vs GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce RTX 2060 Benchmark Comparison #AMD #ModernWarfare #Nvidia TechEpiphany Tech Epiphany. }, 2000 ); Each title is run at its highest settings, and I’ve tested each game at 1,920 x 1,080, 2,560 x 1,440 and 3,840 x 2,160 – 4K.I’ve also used a selection of synthetic benchmarks, with 3D Mark’s demanding Fire Strike test alongside benchmarks to measure power consumption and peak temperature. DiRT 4 also favors Radeon GPUs using CMAA, while Strange Brigade is an AMD sponsored title and well optimized for Radeon GPUs. With the larger number of pixels deployed the RX 480 averaged 57.2fps, which was more than a frame faster than the Nvidia card. It was mostly the older titles, or Nvidia sponsored games where the green team did well, games such as World of Tanks, Warhammer II, Metro Exodus, Project Cars 2, and Fortnite, for example. Text_Color: '', That supports my conclusions from real-world tests: the GTX 970 might be better in lower resolutions and easier games, but the RX 480 is a more efficient architecture and deploys its power with more aplomb – therefore it takes key victories in tougher tests. GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon RX 580. The GTX 970’s lesser specification means it provides a throughput rating of 3.4TFLOPS – far less than the 5.8TFLOPS of the AMD card. Hitman is a game designed with AMD in mind, so the results here aren’t surprising. The new AMD Radeon RX 590 is an uprated version of the RX 580 on the smaller 12nm process node. There’s little between their power consumption ratings, despite that: the RX 480’s 150W power demand is only five Watts higher than the GTX 970. As usual the test system used is powered by a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory. The AMD Radeon RX 560 for laptops (RX 560M) is a mid-range Polaris 11 / 21 gaming graphics card for … Performance in Just Cause 4 was similar using either GPU. This game is full of particle and fire effects, which can make it a little tricky for some GPUs, especially considering I run this test at Ultra settings. I benchmarked the GTX 970 and RX 480 on TrustedReviews’ test rig, which has been designed to match the specifications of a standard enthusiast gaming PC. Intro The GeForce GTX 970 has clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. AMD is building the RX 480 in two versions – one with 4GB of GDDR5 memory, and one with 8GB. GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon RX 580. The GTX 970 mimicked the GTX 1060 3GB, or I guess you could say the 1060 mimics the 970, either way performance was decent despite trailing the R9 290. It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … BG_Color: '', Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 better than AMD Radeon RX 580? The GeForce GPU was 12% faster though I should point out that enabling the new patched-in DX12 mode didn’t change things. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) - Benchmarks, Tests and Comparisons config = { It’s safe to say performance is identical using either GPU. That’s how the GTX 970 and R9 290 stack up in those preliminary titles, seemed as though we saw quite a bit of back and forth. For this test we have 33 games tested at 1080p, a suitable resolution for these GPUs. The GeForce pulled ahead in our test when looking at the average frame rate, however the 1% low result was identical with both managing 40 fps, so overall the experience was much the same. DIRT RallyUltra at 1,920 x 1,080 average
GTX 970: 97.3
RX 480: 88.9Ultra at 2,560 x 1,440, average
GTX 970: 65.4
RX 480: 61.6Ultra at 3,840 x 2,160, average
GTX 970: 34.4
RX 480: 34.7. But, of course, there are external factors to consider as well. The AMD Radeon RX 590 is a desktop graphics card positioned in the mid-range of 2018. The RX 480 consistently beats its rival while consuming less power: its peak draw of 249W is eleven fewer than the same machine with the GTX 970 installed. 24.4 GPixel/s higher pixel rate? That’s a gap of 5.77% improving to a gap of 20.44%. Still in three of the more recently released titles we’ve seen the R9 290 doing well. This is why we typically call it a tie when the margin is 5% or less. Both cards also managed to beat 30fps at 4K, which isn’t too surprising considering that this is a less intensive game. That said the 1% low performance was more consistent, though the experience was still extremely smooth with the 970. Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 v AMD Radeon RX 480 – Performance I’ve tested these powerful cards with five games. It features 1664 SPUs along with 104 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units. AMD’s shrunken architecture consumed less power than its rival, too. As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470. There’s your ‘fine wine’ working right there, a.k.a. Recently we've looked back at the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and the GTX 960, both popular GPUs from yesteryear. Those features have been warmly welcomed, but besides the overall positive responses what we noticed in common in your feedback was the request to test the GeForce GTX 970, which was the performance/value offering of the time and a GPU some of you are still rocking in today's games with some success. And the last game we’re going to look at individually is Far Cry New Dawn and here we have a tie at 70 fps a piece. This can be seen when comparing the GTX 1060 and RX 580 for example, it can also be seen when comparing older GPUs such as the GTX 970 and R9 290. There’s very little to choose between these two cards in the synthetic 3D Mark Fire Strike test. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. } ); AMD’s card has some software features that have also been introduced on Nvidia’s new hardware, like better asynchronous computing. Each title is run at its highest settings, and I’ve … Based on 1,226,223 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 580 and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. AdUnitType: '2', The 970 was still the superior GPU in this title. This is one area where the Maxwell GPUs had a big advantage over the AMD competition and it’s an advantage Nvidia still holds today. The 8GB card will have faster memory, too, with throughput of 8Gbps compared to 7Gbps from the lesser card. window.addEventListener( 'load', function() { Next up we have Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege and here the GTX 970 is more competitive than I was expecting. So here we’re comparing a 2014 release with an MSRP of $330 to a 2016 release with a $250 MSRP. AMD has made the unusual decision to debut its Polaris architecture with this mid-range card. © 2020 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Fortnite is a game that favors Nvidia GPUs thanks to its use of the Unreal Engine 4. Expect slightly different results with different models. That’s a bigger leap than Nvidia has taken with its new 16nm Pascal cards, and it means that AMD can cram even more transistors into the same area without increasing heat and power consumption. Nvidia’s card continued its 1080p lead with an average framerate of 85.4fps, but its advantage was a slim 2fps – and it was overturned when I turned the resolution up to 2,560 x 1,440. }; Either way it’s not great news for the red team. Throughout 2015 the GTX 970 was typically the puncher GPU and with a slew of quality AIB models to pick from, it easily outsold the R9 290. Font: '', The GeForce GTX 590 was an enthusiast-class graphics card by NVIDIA, launched in March 2011. When compared to a modern GPU we’re looking at GTX 1060 3GB-like performance. EVGA. It features the following components: I’ve tested these powerful cards with five games. The 590 does not … The 970 does perform significantly better than the 3GB 1060, but even so you’ll want to dial the quality settings down a little. })(document, window); This is a GPU designed for Full HD and 1440p gaming, and in those department it’s stop on – but any higher resolutions will cause it to struggle. scp.async = true; They are guilty of prioritizing newer architectures while optimizations for older generations tend to come later, if at all for the really old models. If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing... You need to be a member to leave a comment. Whether you're looking to upgrade or not, it should be interesting to see after 5 years which GPU is the ultimate winner... Quickly rewinding for a moment, Nvidia revealed the GTX 970 for the first time in September 2014, some ten months after the Radeon R9 290’s release. World of Tanks is a game that doesn’t like AMD GPUs that much, or AMD GPUs don’t like World of Tanks. Based on 927,070 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 570 and the Nvidia GTX 970, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 652 GPUs. We’re completely attributing the R9 290’s comeback to AMD’s driver development and not anything to do with the partitioned VRAM buffer or Nvidia neglecting driver support. It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … The red team has made bold claims about its new card, saying that it’s the best 1440p and VR-ready card for around £200. This card competes against Nvidia's GTX 1050 Ti and replaces the older Radeon RX 470. Moving on we find a close battle when testing with Resident Evil 2, here the R9 290 was just 6fps faster at 1080p and this meant the 970 performed more like a 3GB 1060, not a bad result given the average frame rate was 66 fps, but this one is still a win for the Radeon 290. However many of those who purchased the R9 290 were jumping up and down about how it would be a better investment down the track. Its Full HD average of 69.7fps was ten frames better than the GTX 970 and on the right side of the crucial 60fps barrier, and it was nine frames quicker than its rival at 1440p. This is the easiest game in this testing setup, with plenty of fast-paced textures but less intensive workloads in other departments. }; ChannelID: '5f2bc16e3709e324807ce0c1', The Radeon’s average of 54.3fps will ensure smooth gameplay at this higher resolution. Intro The GeForce GTX 970 comes with core clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. As a Polaris refresh, the RX 570 runs at a slightly faster clock speed than the RX 470. Built on the 40 nm process, and based on the GF110 graphics processor, in its GF110-351-A1 variant, the card supports DirectX 12. Performance at 1080p using the ultra quality preset certainly was respectable and you won’t need to turn down any quality settings here. Compare those specifications to the Radeon RX 580, which makes use of a 14 nm design. It’s no surprise that both cards blitzed this rally racer at 1080p: the RX 480 averaged 88.9fps, while the Nvidia card was about nine frames faster. So the GeForce GTX 970 was the more consistent performer, the smaller 3.5GB primary VRAM partition will have hurt it in Wolfenstein, especially with the settings used for testing. Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB GDDR5 (256 Bit) DVI-D, 2xHDMI, 2xDP (11265-31-20G) Lite-On iHAS124-14 SilentiumPC Armis AR3 TG (SPC199) HyperX DDR4, 16GB, 3200MHz, CL16 (HX432C16PB3K2/16) MSI B450 TOMAHAWK AMD Ryzen 5 2600 3.9GHz, 16MB, BOX (YD2600BBAFBOX) XFX TS Single Rail 650W (P1-650G-TS3X) Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SATA3 … Its average of 30.6fps is five frames better than the GTX 970 and it does break the important 30fps barrier, but don’t assume that it’ll play Hitman smoothly at 4K without compromising on several of the graphics options. We haven’t tested the GTX 1060 in 3GB form, but we have full benchmarks of the 6GB version, which show it’s a worthy 1440p card. The Division 2 is a title that works exceptionally well with AMD hardware. Frame rates were surprisingly similar when testing with Battlefield V, here the GTX 970 was just 3 fps faster which comes to be a 5% margin. i[btoa('video intelligence start')].init(config); Seriously though, that’s an impressive comeback for the R9 290. Based on what we’ve seen so far we don’t imagine the GTX 970 is still 10-15% faster like what most reviewers found back in late 2014. AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs. Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super: Which Graphics Card to Buy for 1440p Gaming? Despite its 3.5GB of fast VRAM, the GTX 970 remains the more reliable performer which might surprise some of you, especially after you’ve no doubt heard over and over again how it’s doomed and will be completely useless before too long. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon RX 590: Which mid-range budget graphics card should you buy? On average the 970 was 14% slower. AMD’s slow driver development. Nvidia grabbed recent headlines with its flagship GPU launches, but AMD stole some of that thunder with the new Radeon RX 480. Shadow of the Tomb Raider is another title that sees AMD GPUs doing quite well and here the GTX 970 was 12% slower than the R9 290. Let's see those blue bar graphs now... First up we have Apex Legends and right away we’re seeing pretty neck and neck performance between the GTX 970 and R9 290. options here in mid-2019. (v.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || v.documentElement.appendChild(v.createElement('head'))).appendChild(scp); Hitman Max Settings at 1,920 x 1,080, average
GTX 970: 59
RX 480: 69.7Max Settings at 2,560 x 1,440, average
GTX 970: 45.4
RX 480: 54.3Max Settings at 3,840 x 2,160, average
GTX 970: 25.08
RX 480: 30.6. The RX 480 delivers excellent Full HD and 1440p performance for a surprisingly low price – and its consistent leads in tougher tests bode well for the future and indicate that AMD’s new hardware is doing its job. We’ll look closely at the results for 13 of the titles before moving into a few head to head comparison graphs. 67.3 GPixel/s vs 42.9 GPixel/s For those wondering back when we reviewed the GTX 1060 6GB at launch, the 970 was 15% slower, so no ‘Nvidia gimping’ as it’s often referred to appears to have taken place. The midrange GPU market is suddenly flush with super (and Super!) Here the 970 was 18% faster, delivering 87 fps on average. The RX 480 maintained its slim advantage with an average of 39.3fps. AMD did respond with aggressive R9 290 price cuts but with the 970 generally 10-15% faster on average and considerably better power efficiency, it went on to be a best seller, despite the VRAM controversy. This is how we make money. I was surprised when the AMD hardware took a slim lead: its 34.7fps average is 0.3fps ahead of the Nvidia card. That’s clear evidence of the newer architecture, increased memory throughput and shrunken manufacturing process paying dividends. It's also the cooler GPU but most important of all, either solution will let you play games at 1080p comfortably all these years later. The card based on the GM204 Maxwell chip, that is already available in the desktop GeForce GTX 970 … It doesn’t sound like much of a contest on paper, but the benchmarks reveal a far closer fight than I expected. With the release of the GeForce GTX 1660, Nvidia is resetting its midrange GPU line and putting AMD's Radeon RX 590 square in the crosshairs. The GTX 970 did well in this title and as we’ve seen many times already, it’s often very similar to the 3GB GTX 1060. For the testing, I’m using the MSI GAMING GeForce GTX 970 4GB and Gigabyte Radeon RX 580 8GB Gaming graphics cards. Benchmarks with Battlefield V, Deus Ex Mankind Divided, GTA 5, Witcher 3, Metal Gear Solid 5 and other popular games The RX 480 remains a mid-range card, so expectations should be managed. With those comparisons previously established it comes as no surprise that the R9 290 dusts the GTX 970 beating it by a 19% margin. The GTX 970 uses the older 28nm manufacturing process, which means it has half a billion fewer transistors than its rival, and it only has 1,664 stream processors. Middle-earth: Shadow of MordorUltra at 1,920 x 1,080 average
GTX 970: 85.4
RX 480: 83.6Ultra at 2,560 x 1,440, average
GTX 970: 55.9RX 480: 57.2Ultra at 3,840 x 2,160, average
GTX 970: 37.7
RX 480: 39.3. The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 has arrived on the scene in both 3GB and 6GB guises. Finally a solid win for the GTX 970, this time testing with Hitman 2 using the DirectX 11 API. And, finally, it’s cooler – albeit only by three degrees. Now if you’ve been holding out all these years for a $300-$400 upgrade, the GeForce RTX 2060 might be of interest. The R9 290 was able to deliver very playable performance but we see a 36% uplift when looking at the GTX 970 and that’s obviously significant. There’s a clear trend to be seen across most of my test games: if a game is a tougher benchmark, the RX 480 tends to outperform its older rival. That said let’s see what the 33 game comparison has for us. The Vega architecture is built on 14 nm silicon and contains next-generation compute units (nCUs). ... GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is one of Nvidia's lower end graphics card. Índice de píxeles 17.76 GPixel/s mayor? 67.3 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s scp.onload = function() { This one’s too close to call and well within the margin of error. The GTX 970 leads the way with a score of 2,767 points, but the RX 480 is barely behind thanks to its result of 2,638 points. It is manufactured in 12nm and offers 2,304 shader cores and 8 GB GDDR5 VRAM using a … The Radeon’s top temperature of 70°C is an excellent result, and it means there’s no need to fret about overheating.Performance Conclusions. Warum ist Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 besser als AMD Radeon RX 590? There you have it, the GTX 970 went from ~10-15% faster four years ago to a percent faster in 2019 against the Radeon R9 290 based on our 33 game test sample that includes many newer titles. The Radeon’s specification compares well to Nvidia’s older card. That means the GTX 970 had an 8.63% lead, but the gap closed to 5.81% at 1440p – perhaps because the RX 480 is flexing its extra transistors and memory. setTimeout( function() { Those 34fps averages will be undermined by sluggish minimum framerates, especially when the on-screen action becomes more frantic. That means the game isn’t playable at its maximum settings at 3,840 x 2,160, but it was a whopping 37.61% faster than the GTX 970 in the same test. The test rig drew 249W from the mains with the Radeon installed, which is 11W less than the Nvidia-powered machine required. If you want to read our individual reviews, you can click here for the RX 480 and the GTX 970. In this comparison, the RX 480 takes a clear win in the 1440p stakes. It features 1664 SPUs as well as 104 TAUs and 64 Rasterization Operator Units. 67.3 GPixel/s vs 49.54 GPixel/s Each NCU houses 64 steam processors, of which the Vega 56 has 3584 vs. 4096 in the Vega 64. This meant it was 23% faster than the R9 290, placing it basically on par with 6GB GTX 1060 and RX 590. FontSize: '', scp.src='https://s.vi-serve.com/tagLoader.js'; The Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 sits in the middle of Nvidia’s latest range, but it’s not got new hardware inside – its Maxwell architecture first debuted in 2013’s mainstream GTX 750 Ti card.